Ah, good points. Well, Scott, since you've captured all our running averages, maybe there could be a second award for biggest difference between our average right now and the average of our 2008 FS? That would be a separate award, equivalent to "Most Improved."
That would be a lovely idea, something like the most improved player on the nba. I think this would be great.
Ah, good points. Well, Scott, since you've captured all our running averages, maybe there could be a second award for biggest difference between our average right now and the average of our 2008 FS? That would be a separate award, equivalent to "Most Improved."
That would be a lovely idea, something like the most improved player on the nba. I think this would be great.
Álex.
If it uses our all time averages rather than a smaller more recent sample, which would be far more accurate, it won't reward the most improved. This is what happened in the old WPL when an already great (by DPC standards) Joey Lawrence won most improved even though all he did was perform at the same level he had been prior to the WPL but because of his low overall average 5.7 currently, he won it. Such a player can keep winning it every year without any improvement in this kind of format. Overall average is a very poor indicator of current ability and performance.
Congrats to the superstars, new calc sounds interesting.
Lynne
finishing up 21st, beat out for 20th by Pedro who didn't even have to enter the last two months to do that. :-P
Congrates guys I think anybody who averages more 6 in free study is heck of a photographer.
(I am not sure if I am even close to these people).
Hats off.
