Thanks to the SC for scrubbing the rouge account...my score jumped 0.1 points with one vote!
Okay......I'm clueless....what the heck are you talking about?????
There were two newly created accounts that had nearly identical voting stats and extremely low voting average. They were deleted and at least a couple scores went up by quite a bit.
Again, what are you talking about? Is there a thread on this subject?
I do not know if there is a thread on the subject. I had two comments from these users. Their stats for voting, commenting, and average vote cast were nearly identical. Both accounts were created in the last day. Both are now inactive. After accounts were deleted my score went up by over 0.1. I have no other information.
I'm guessing that SC didn't announce it because less than 100 votes were cast each for two brand new users. Only about 100 people who received comments would even know they existed since they did not participate in forums or challenges.
I was doing a refresh and my votes went down by 1 and the score went up by 0.1. The vote that was removed was someone that left a comment. When clicking on the comment left by that account (opened on August 13,2007), it was no longer active.
Elementary, my dear Watson
Originally posted by levyj413:
Originally posted by mad_brewer:
Originally posted by NikonJeb:
Originally posted by bassbone:
Thanks to the SC for scrubbing the rouge account...my score jumped 0.1 points with one vote!
Okay......I'm clueless....what the heck are you talking about?????
There were two newly created accounts that had nearly identical voting stats and extremely low voting average. They were deleted and at least a couple scores went up by quite a bit.
Again, what are you talking about? Is there a thread on this subject?
(the comment was from a three vote that basically told me my colours were way out of wack. looks like DPC disagrees with you, bucko!)
i see that my photo was one of 8 that this person has ever voted on. hopefully they dont make it to 80!
It's a wonder people comment at all anymore.
Congrats on your nice score...good luck.
Why, cause theyre afraid of getting called out in the forums? I'm sorry, but if someone is going to troll vote me on account of THEIR hardware issue... I'm going to be annoyed about it. I'm all for constructive criticism, but the crit has to make sense for it be constructive.
If the 6.xx holds here and my Upside Down 6.xx holds (wouldn't it be nice if it were changed to a 9.xx in honor of the challenge title?), I'll have accomplished my goal of having all 6+ scores on my profile page :-) That would be pretty exciting.
Also may come close to another goal (having a better than average average, so 5.5+ ... I'm at 5.4931 now but haven't done the math to figure out exactly what I need to get over 5.5 ... any 6+ scores definitely can't hurt!).
But I bet I've just guaranteed that my next challenge score will be in the 4.xx range ;-)
Now his account has been cancelled, I feel free to bring the subject up - what was the score with dmisi (other than an average of 2.8, I mean)? He/she seemed to have taken to heart the 'rule' of commenting if your vote is less than 3, which seemed a bit strange - one of our more anarchic members trying to get a rise in the forums?
