thanks, deb, but i was hoping the user would step up, as it really is a photo fitting the name ;-)
Take heart - maybe he/she didn't vote in the challenge.
well, i simply find it incredulous that any active member wouldn't at least do a text search of the thumbnails just to see if their name was used, then to at least fave every one of those, especially if it's a decent photo...
...some constructive criticism in some of the comments - And I agree with their critical judgment (and I knew it when I submitted). :-)
Not complaining at all - I am thankful that people take the time to comment.
It's always tough to guess a final placement, but I would guess that this score would put me in the top 30 (hopefully). There are some good images in this challenge. We'll see...:-)
Edit: Just checked the images again - now I hope this score falls in the top 50!
Is this a low scoring challenge or the high 6`s and 7`s are hiding somewhere?
I think that most people in the 7 range generally don't want to be seen to be gloating. I doubt the challenge is particularly low scoring. On the other hand, if it is, I'll be in with a shot at a reasonably decent placing!
Stats: You have rated 357 of 361 images (99%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 15 images (4%) in this challenge.
... and this was the breakdown...
ten's 5
nine's 12
eight's 26
seven's 51
six's 92
five's 129
four's 43
and no 1's, 2's, or 3's.
For an average vote in this challenge... 5.843
...in the 7 range generally don't want to be seen to be gloating. ... I'll be in with a shot at a reasonably decent placing!
*Passive Gloating*
:-)
Ahhh, the art of the convenient quotation...are you a journalist :). Sadly it WAS a relatively high scoring challenge, and my 6.6 disappeared into the 20's, never to be seen again. I was closer to 6.7, but the vote scrubber seems to have stolen almost a full .1 (either that or I got a bunch of low scores at the end).
