IMG_4134.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Jinjit:
too clean and NIed.... you loose all details of the roses.
Try use the history brush on teh roses along and return some noise back to them. Or try adding a bit more contrast only to roses, or burn only the shadows of them with a very small burning amount (like 5% or even less). This might also help retain some of the details back.

Other then that I really like this composition and am now feeling very sorry for not shooting one at my brother's wedding!

IMG_4071.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Jinjit:
The million dollar smile.
Great picture!!

IMG_4092.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Jinjit:
ok, correction. This one is prolly the best of the series ;-)
I love this POV!!

IMG_4079.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Jinjit:
I have no idea what this sign means, but this one looks to me like one of the best in the series!

I might be tempted to clone out that black thing on the right as it catches the eye a lot more then it should. But even as it is I like this picture a lot!

IMG_4074.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Jinjit:
A classic wedding shot.
Again, a shallower DOF would have been better, although this one is really easy to fix in PS.
Select just the crowd and apply lens blur on it. Not a high value. Just a little to make them go a bit blury and thus make couple stand out more.

Also, I would clone out that little shadow on the right side of the groom. (well ok, groom's left side. Right side of picture)

IMG_4087.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Jinjit:
Nice memory for the couple.
I think however the composition would have been better if you would point your camera tad bit higher.
I feel the cross above the couple is far more important then the red carpet at bottom.

If you have any other good pic of the cross from about same focal point, you could try paste the part of the cross that is missing here, then chop off the part of carpet to pretty much where her dress begins.

IMG_4058.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Jinjit:
This is beautiful!
I would use a shallower DOF here though. Since you don't see faces on the back anyway, they don't need all to be in focus.
A little tip for your next wedding shoot ;-)

Dreaming
by Tiberius

Comment by whiteroom:
ridiculas score for such good work!

Message edited by author 2005-10-05 09:59:08.

IMG_4110.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Tiberius:
Yes you're right. I'll redo it without NI. I think we are all crazy with this noice thing which actually is not that bad at all!
Thanks for the comment!

IMG_4156.jpg
by Tiberius

Comment by Jinjit:
Great wedding pic. I think the couple should be real happy about them.
I would love to see the rest too!