Money can heal most thing
by kasaba

Comment by ShutterPug:
aww, poor baby. Hope he/she heals well

Deceptive Beauty
by kasaba

Comment by cshultz:
I LIKE IT,NICE JOB

Tire Jump
by kasaba

Comment by tanguera:
Oh yes. Perfect interpretation of this challenge. What a look of intensity, and those little tucked up paws!!!! I might have played a bit more with the lighting.

Money can heal most thing
by kasaba

Comment by jomari:
oh, poor thing! I hope it does heal up well. Great photo in spite of the sad subject.

Money can heal most thing
by kasaba

Comment by JuliBoc:
Sad looking face.

Tire Jump
by kasaba

Comment by lola72:
Fantastic capture ... I use to do agility with my pouch . its super fun :)

Tire Jump
by kasaba

Comment by neophyte:
I have to rate GSP photos high or my Sofia will bite me.... Great shot! A bit more contrast or a levels adjustment would give this more pop. (IMO)

Peas in a pod
by kasaba

Comment by Silent-Shooter:
All the 1's, 2's, 3's and maybe even the 4's will be the people that take the challenge description very literally. If you had taken the extra peas out so that there were only 2 left in the pod this would have scored above 6 guaranteed!
Composition works nicely and the leading lines take you up the page from bottom left to top right, right past the main subjects - the peas! Well done.
I can tell by the shadows there were two lights above the pea pod. It really helped to bring out the detail in the transparency of the pod and I like it a lot. The shadows could have been a bit softer by using something to diffuse the lights between the subject and lights like white paper / white sheet etc. That would make the shadows have less of an "edge" and be more pleasing to the eye.
You shot it on ISO 200 - try go for 100 wherever possible. DPC hates noise and although 200 ISO shouldn’t give that much noise I see a fair bit here. Perhaps your original was quite a bit darker and you brightened it a lot in PP - that also adds a lot of noise. If I'm wrong then I'm stumped???
DPC also loves smooth soft even backgrounds. Your white BG looks a bit yellow on my screen and is a little "textured". It might be due to some noise but probably the type of BG you used for the shoot. I see some dust spots bottom left and top right that can be cleaned up in advanced editing. You can also remove the little bits of pod that are sticking off like threads. I'm telling you now some people would mark you down a point or two for that! Its better to remove it before the shot is taken the PP is easier.

Deceptive Beauty
by kasaba

Comment by Silent-Shooter:
Macro isn't my thing so take this comment with a pinch of salt...
As the others have said below there isnt anything / much in focus. DPC loves sharp focus and on macro shots it is even more important. Yes shallow DOF was required for this challenge but something clearly needed to be in focus to qualify for the speed voter that rushes through and votes on a photo in less than 5 seconds.
I see your apperture was 5.6 - you might have wanted to try and shoot it at more like f/16 or smaller to increase the DOF you would get... the counter side of that is that you either need a longer shutter speed or higher ISO. If this was handheld then it would also be a reason why it is not pin sharp - 1/13 of a second is pretty slow for this type of work. It needs to be nearer 1/200 sec to keep the image from being blury.
It is a nice abstract looking shot but abstract normally doesnt do too well here... that is if you are worried about the scores.

Apocalyptic Sunset
by kasaba

Comment by Silent-Shooter:
Hi Gaby
Yes - No 1's or 2's. Always a good thing but even the best of shots and winners of challenges get 1's for reasons I can’t understand but some voters obviously have different tastes to what the majority do and we have to just accept it.
Your decision to leave just a hint of detail on the FG hill was probably what got you over the 6 mark - might have been a bit better with a bit more detail but we will never know now :-).
Composition wise - things are set out nicely and fit into the "thirds rule" nicely with the land on bottom third and the rays coming out of the lower left third intersection.
Seeing as it was advanced editing I would have added some Gaussian Blur to the sky. I see you shot it at ISO 400 and there isn’t terrible noise but I would make it smoother than it currently is. The sky could do with some more contrast (many ways of doing this) to make the rays pop out a lot more.
Sharpening on the clouds looks fine but the horizon looks a bit soft. Some more sharpening is required there.
Need anything else? Give me a PM